Issue Comment Events

Projects RADIUSS Home

github-actions[bot] commented on issue mfem/mfem#4105.

:warning: This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last month. If no activity occurs in the next week, it will be automatically closed. Thank you for your contributions….

View Comment

vsoch commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#5326.

I just hit this on Google Cloud (rocky): …

View Comment

codecov[bot] commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6320.

## Codecov Report…

View Comment

wdconinc commented on issue spack/spack#47888.

You apparently don’t even need a large environment to reproduce this (or any environment at all). …

View Comment

spackbot-app[bot] commented on issue spack/spack#48255.

View Comment

kftsehk commented on issue spack/spack#48267.

> On Spack’s side we should not cache null. …

View Comment

v-dobrev commented on issue mfem/mfem#4643.

Merged in next for testing……

View Comment

vladotomov commented on issue mfem/mfem#4642.

Hi @thorvath12, take a look at the implementation of …

View Comment

adam-sim-dev commented on issue mfem/mfem#4641.

Curious about the difference between https://github.com/mfem/mfem/pull/4460 …

View Comment

acfisher commented on issue mfem/mfem#4641.

@mlstowell I think I managed to extract a coherent piece of work from that branch. I believe you put pretty much all of this is your work. It compiles and passes all of the tests except sedov have a look and let me know if you think this is ready for review….

View Comment

cglwdm commented on issue mfem/mfem#4639.

I use the code …

View Comment

JustinPrivitera commented on issue visit-dav/visit#20166.

See the linked discussion for images and additional context….

View Comment

codecov[bot] commented on issue flux-framework/flux-sched#1268.

## Codecov Report…

View Comment

garlick commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6534.

Thanks! Doing that!…

View Comment

grondo commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6534.

Already approved, so feel free to set MWP!…

View Comment

kab163 commented on issue LLNL/Umpire#795.

Built with …

View Comment

davidbeckingsale commented on issue LLNL/Umpire#912.

Still waiting on the BLT PR, coming soon!…

View Comment

markcmiller86 commented on issue visit-dav/visit#20160.

Any chance you can attach the associated session file. The # in the format string is odd to me and probably defeating the logic I added to try first what is specified in the format string before using anything embedded in the actual string itself….

View Comment

rhornung67 commented on issue LLNL/blt#714.

Thank you @tdrwenski !…

View Comment

JustinPrivitera commented on issue Alpine-DAV/ascent#1435.

num_domains is wrong in different places in the ascent info node…

View Comment

nicolemarsaglia commented on issue Alpine-DAV/ascent#1435.

Those are what I had written down as well. And an xml-lite reader, but I like the first two options for colors tables better. …

View Comment

grondo commented on issue flux-framework/flux-sched#1321.

Is it possible that the flux-core docker images hadn’t yet updated?…

View Comment

lindstro commented on issue LLNL/zfp#247.

The CMake find_package issue has to do with the deprecation of FindCUDA in CMake as of version 3.27 (see #232). Any chance you can use an earlier version of CMake? I have partially updated the staging branch to use FindCUDAToolkit, which hopefully will address this. I will push these changes in the next few days but would like to do more testing first….

View Comment

djagodzinski commented on issue LLNL/maestrowf#430.

Hello, has there been any progress on adding support for PBS? I’m interested in using Maestro with AWS, which uses PBS. Thanks!…

View Comment

molohov commented on issue LLNL/maestrowf#424.

Any chance of moving this along? I would love to have DFS implemented for our use case….

View Comment

justinlaughlin commented on issue GLVis/glvis#289.

Should this be squashed before merging? There is a lot of commits….

View Comment

jessdagostini commented on issue LLNL/Caliper#629.

I put a topdown.all trial to run yesterday night, before leaving lab. For my surprise, it is still running. …

View Comment

ilumsden commented on issue LLNL/Caliper#629.

Oh, I didn’t realize that about topdown-counters. I can remove those….

View Comment

wrtobin commented on issue GEOS-DEV/LvArray#338.

misclick…

View Comment

jakirkham commented on issue LLNL/zfp#210.

Thanks David! 🥳…

View Comment

da-wad commented on issue LLNL/zfp#210.

Wheels for zfpy 1.0.1 are now built (against numpy 2.xx) and released here on PyPI using zfpy-wheels! …

View Comment

tepperly commented on issue LLNL/hiop#700.

If you use blt along with CMake, you can specify the style checking approach. Testing compliance clang-format is a matter of seeing if make check has a clear return status. You can apply the style rules with a make style….

View Comment

kminemur commented on issue LLNL/zfp#244.

I mean just compiling is no problem without NVIDA GPU. GPU….

View Comment

bgunnar5 commented on issue LLNL/merlin#489.

@lucpeterson yeah that’s the plan. Once the new tests are merged then all these tests should pass. We’ll still need to create tests for the manager itself but I’m going to get started on that hopefully this week. We also need to figure out a good way to integrate the manager command with the existing monitor command, as there’s a lot of overlap there….

View Comment

lucpeterson commented on issue LLNL/merlin#489.

Ping on this. Is the plan to merge the new test stuff in and then keep going?…

View Comment

rw-anderson commented on issue LLNL/hatchet#123.

I struggled with a similar issue. Eventually I tracked it down to picking up an older installed version of cali-query and using that in conjunction with my locally built caliper library. Once I matched those versions, this error went away….

View Comment

michaelmckinsey1 commented on issue LLNL/hatchet#152.

Matching a single node with name my_node

View Comment

rountree commented on issue hpc/Spindle#56.

Point taken wrt scaling and file pollution. I can imagine a solution where messages (with their priority) are buffered until initialization occurs, then parsed to see if they’re logged or discarded. It’s not wholly unlike trying to make printf() work in _start() before your file descriptors are set up, and, perhaps like that, it’s not a problem worth solving (or not worth solving this week). …

View Comment

PhilipDeegan commented on issue LLNL/SAMRAI#93.

closed by #277…

View Comment