Issue Comment Events

Projects RADIUSS Home

cyrush commented on issue visit-dav/visit#20346.

We need to figure out if the current version can work, however this will be deferred to future releases. …

View Comment

biagas commented on issue visit-dav/visit#20346.

https://project.inria.fr/damaris/documentation/…

View Comment

markcmiller86 commented on issue visit-dav/visit#20341.

> Steps to reproduce the behavior. For example:…

View Comment

greenc-FNAL commented on issue spack/spack#49284.

@jcpunk This is ready for final review and merge….

View Comment

hppritcha commented on issue spack/spack#50366.

i’ll take a look. i suspect the ucx spackage may need some updating….

View Comment

K20shores commented on issue spack/spack#50252.

Thanks @tldahlgren. …

View Comment

prudhomm commented on issue spack/spack#50366.

everything is fine with ucx~rocm

View Comment

rhc54 commented on issue spack/spack#50371.

Should only be true if building from Git clone - not if you are building from a tarball. Can look at it to see impact of not doing things that require Python during build….

View Comment

codecov[bot] commented on issue flux-framework/flux-sched#1332.

## Codecov Report…

View Comment

grondo commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6705.

Thanks for the nudge @sam-maloney! …

View Comment

sam-maloney commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6705.

@grondo perhaps a gentle nudge for a review now that the May release is complete :)…

View Comment

codecov[bot] commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6705.

## Codecov Report…

View Comment

artv3 commented on issue LLNL/RAJA#1838.

I’m a bit confused on why this PR is out of date with develop, additionally it won’t let me update the branch using the web interface…

View Comment

kkier commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6794.

> > If we look for 1001 jobs and only return 1000, that’s not really taking any longer than if we were looking for 1000, right?…

View Comment

chu11 commented on issue flux-framework/flux-core#6802.

re-pushed, I went with a mildly more complex / sophisticated approach. Instead of requesting N entries from job-list, I request N+1 entries from the job-list module. The length of the returned result is used as “detection” of truncation, and the output warning is output if it is indeed truncated….

View Comment

bgunnar5 commented on issue LLNL/merlin#498.

@lucpeterson @doutriaux1 This PR needs a new review as I’ve changed it a lot. See the new description above to understand what all is in this….

View Comment

kennyweiss commented on issue LLNL/axom#1569.

> If Camp does require umpire, then this means Serac always depends on umpire (given Serac always depends on axom and camp) and should no longer have an umpire variant….

View Comment

chapman39 commented on issue LLNL/axom#1569.

That does match this: https://github.com/LLNL/axom/blob/develop/src/cmake/thirdparty/SetupAxomThirdParty.cmake#L33…

View Comment

trws commented on issue flux-framework/flux-sched#1362.

Ping, it would be good to get this merged to take care of #1180….

View Comment

HaluskaR commented on issue LLNL/axom#1559.

Anyone else I should request a review from? If not, I’m going to make a push for the curveNames/orderedCurveNames changes…

View Comment

cyrush commented on issue Alpine-DAV/ascent#1509.

Screenshot 2025-05-05 at 5 17 12 PM

View Comment

woutdenolf commented on issue LLNL/merlin#505.

Yes: https://workflows.community/systems/merlin/ …

View Comment

v-dobrev commented on issue LLNL/RAJA#1830.

Note: the original warning reported in this issue is from 1-b (from the comment in the above code snippet). Since 1-b does not actually do anything, it can be safely replaced with 1-c (empty pragma) without change in the generated code. However, the host code generated with and without CUDA will be different….

View Comment

JustinPrivitera commented on issue LLNL/conduit#1424.

Ok, let’s look side-by-side. Debugging it the first time took several hours and I never could find out what was going wrong….

View Comment

cyrush commented on issue LLNL/conduit#1424.

I still want to discuss why we have to use the unique pointers. Something is off if you were seeing crashes with and I want to understand….

View Comment

tdrwenski commented on issue LLNL/blt#719.

BTW I don’t have permission to re-run the tioga jobs (or I can but then I get Error encountered during job: you are currently unauthorized to use this runner)…

View Comment

BenWibking commented on issue Alpine-DAV/ascent#1378.

@cyrush @pgrete I think the issue is that BLT does not work correctly with the Kokkos nvcc_wrapper wrapper compiler. Is this fixed in newer BLT versions?…

View Comment

michaelmckinsey1 commented on issue LLNL/hatchet#159.

@slabasan If we want to skip 22.04 and go 24.04 we need to remove python 3.7…

View Comment

kab163 commented on issue LLNL/blt#719.

> @kab163 can you put the compile command here or send me a host-config to reproduce this? …

View Comment

white238 commented on issue LLNL/blt#719.

@kab163 can you put the compile command here or send me a host-config to reproduce this?…

View Comment

nychiang commented on issue LLNL/hiop#726.

@thartland Is your 0.0.6 ready to PR merge? Or should I rename it as 0.0.6 and yours be 0.0.7?…

View Comment

cyrush commented on issue LLNL/blt#718.

When updating there were several cases I had to switch to use blt::hip b/c blt_hip was not sufficient. …

View Comment

rgommers commented on issue LLNL/zfp#210.

> Is there a way to identify which commit the zfpy wheels are linked to?…

View Comment

liu15 commented on issue LLNL/CHAI#167.

> @adayton1 I think your PR #195 is similar to this, and I prefer the fine-grained approach here. …

View Comment